Roe v. Wade: U.S. Supreme Court – Lawyers Present Oral Arguments (1971) – 844-292-1318 Connecticut legal aid

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. More on the topic: https://www.amazon.com/gp/search?ie=UTF8&tag=mg03-20&linkCode=ur2&linkId=7e1f3f3b49a4eebefe522570108d2cf9&camp=1789&creative=9325&index=books&keywords=roe%20wade

Decided simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton, the Court ruled 7–2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman’s decision to have an abortion, but that right must be balanced against the state’s two legitimate interests in regulating abortions: protecting prenatal life and protecting women’s health. Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a pregnancy, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the trimester of pregnancy.

The Court later rejected Roe’s trimester framework, while affirming Roe’s central holding that a person has a right to abortion until viability. The Roe decision defined “viable” as being “potentially able to live outside the mother’s womb, albeit with artificial aid”, adding that viability “is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks.”

In disallowing many state and federal restrictions on abortion in the United States, Roe v. Wade prompted a national debate that continues today, about issues including whether and to what extent abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, what methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication, and what the role should be of religious and moral views in the political sphere. Roe v. Wade reshaped national politics, dividing much of the United States into pro-choice and pro-life camps, while activating grassroots movements on both sides.

According to the Court, “the restrictive criminal abortion laws in effect in a majority of States today are of relatively recent vintage.” In 1821, Connecticut passed the first state statute criminalizing abortion. Every state had abortion legislation by 1900.[5] In the United States, abortion was sometimes considered a common law crime,[6] though Justice Blackmun would conclude that the criminalization of abortion did not have “roots in the English common-law tradition.”[7]

Prior history of the case

In June 1969, Norma L. McCorvey discovered she was pregnant with her third child. She returned to Dallas, Texas, where friends advised her to assert falsely that she had been raped in order to obtain a legal abortion (with the understanding that Texas law allowed abortion in cases of rape and incest). However, this scheme failed because there was no police report documenting the alleged rape. She attempted to obtain an illegal abortion, but found the unauthorized site had been closed down by the police. Eventually, she was referred to attorneys Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington.[8] (McCorvey would give birth before the case was decided.)

In 1970, Coffee and Weddington filed suit in a U.S. District Court in Texas on behalf of McCorvey (under the alias Jane Roe). The defendant in the case was Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade, representing the State of Texas. McCorvey was no longer claiming her pregnancy was the result of rape, and later acknowledged that she had lied about having been raped.[9][10] “Rape” is not mentioned in the judicial opinions in this case.[11]

The district court ruled in McCorvey’s favor on the legal merits of her case, and declined to grant an injunction against the enforcement of the laws barring abortion.[11] The district court’s decision was based upon the 9th Amendment, and the court relied upon a concurring opinion by Justice Arthur Goldberg in the 1965 Supreme Court case of Griswold v. Connecticut,[12] finding in the decision for a right to privacy.[13]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v_wade
Video Rating: / 5

10 thoughts on “Roe v. Wade: U.S. Supreme Court – Lawyers Present Oral Arguments (1971) – 844-292-1318 Connecticut legal aid”

  1. women who are not ready to become mothers are pro-choice. Men who are not ready to become fathers are considered deadbeats. So much for the Civil Rights Act and equality. Roe's Attorney argues an unplanned pregnancy disrupts a woman's life and ability to pursue an education. Yeah and an unplanned pregnancy doesn't affect a father's life either huh? we need to pass some legislation to even the playing Ground for men's Reproductive Rights. There needs to be a whole Reformation to the family law system.

  2. the judge asked the lady solicitor if texas has any laws on unborn children being given property rights, she then says that only if the child is born alive.. so is she saying that while it is in the womb it is not alive? if so then she is wrong !! the judge should have picked up on this…
    if however she is saying that the child is only alive once it comes out the womb, then that means it is a matter of location that determines if you are a human or not. (which obv don't make sense)
    and the final argument to be had is that the child is relying on the mothers life support to be alive, so it is does not have human rights anymore , so are we saying that when people are on life support in the hospital they seize to be human? I do not think so..
    this case was just a sham.. the bible tells us that these things would come to pass anyway….. and god said he will give them up to their reprobate mind

  3. god vs satan
    man shall marry a woman ……. gay marriage legalised
    god created the universe……. evolution says no
    you shall not have any idols ….. celebreties, pagan gods
    rest on the Sabbath…… Constantine changed the Sabbath day
    no sex be4 marriage…. lets promote condoms and promote safe sex
    the rainbow was a promise from god to man….. the lgbt community had to steal it
    this is but a few facts to try and ponder on, the devil is only using us to provoke god….

  4. If abortions are legal. Even term abortions. Then why not legalize stem cell research to cure Parkinson's and maybe even production of body parts. Hypocrisy.

  5. 43:26– Mr. Floyd: "…I think the pregnancy may terminate that choice."
    Justice Stewart: "Maybe she makes her choice when she decides to live in Texas."

  6. Constitution of the United States 1798
    Article. III.   Section. 1.
    The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.
    Section. 2.
    The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States;—between a State and Citizens of another State;—between Citizens of different States;—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
       In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.
          The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.
    Section. 3.
    Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
      The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

  7. The Supreme jewish Court of the United jewish States! If you pass the bar this means you are a jewish lawyer and are willing to accept jew money in exchange for
    acting like a lawyer and taking fake cases. Hence, if the supreme court judges are
    lawyers__they are jew lawyers and must bow down to jewish law "Witch" is in
    opposition to American Constitutional law. The jews on the bench will always rule in favor of the jews and the jewish invasion of America. The jews are Telepathic, Mind Controlling, Collectives that enslave and destroy Human Gentiles. The Super jews, 
    my definition, have stolen all the money via their bogus banking laws and scams and are allowed to legally steal all the money because they made and approved the banking laws. So, if you have a legal brain in your body you should be able to figure out that the jew lawyers that are Zionators and thier house stooges make laws that support the jews and the jewish invasion. But, what about the presidents of America? All jewish__and that is a no brainer! And the stupid Civil War was started
    by a jew lawyer, Lincoln, because there were too many poor white trash Human men in America and not enough jew jobs to keep them busy so he put guns in their hands and said kill each other while the negros laughed and laughed. So, you gonna believe American jewish history written by the jews so you can't figure out what the hell is going on or are you going to listen to a globally censored Human Gentile with a PhD in science who is trying to expose the Super jews and save American Constitutional values and humanity?

  8. The investigative Firm-We provide complete background checks, asset searches & skip tracing services nationwide. Please contact  (214) 406-5422 , Toolfree number  800-681-5262
    

Comments are closed.